For almost 6 years government authorities of Mexico, are in very serious trouble due to an arrest police against a French citizen. He was arrested for belonging, say, a criminal gang of kidnappers operating in several States of the Republic, especially in the state of Morelos.
French President in one of his visits to Mexico, made no direct mention of the case of his compatriot, with whom he had talked in prison, and in full House of Representatives urged the legislators to see justice done in a clear and transparent to the public gala, stating on the floor of the parliamentary precincts total disagreement and dissatisfaction with the unlawful arrest of the alleged kidnapper ...
It turns out that several of the victims, being detained French citizen, said widely recognize as the executor of several violent threats and want to carry out mutilations on their bodies to force their relatives to deliver the ransom.
The prosecution of the case has already taken more time appointed by law and the alleged kidnapper, and was even sentenced to serve 60 years in prison for the crimes of deprivation of liberty, organized crime, assault and other charges.
His lawyer appealed the sentence and is now a senior judge of the Supreme Court is reviewing the case suggesting that the French citizen and should be released because the trial that was submitted, is riddled with irregularities and it is very difficult to say exactly legal guilt. Even the involvement in the crimes attributed to him ...
The truth of the matter is that the Mexican police if you have made successful and effective investigation, which made them a good time to invest, to the place from where they operated and criminals hiding the band - whose leader, indeed, a lover of French, has been detained for quite a while too, and he was sentenced without the right if any appeal, if it is totally guilty of all crimes-against him, only that investigators incurred a major flaw: Once carried out the arrest - a fact not known at that place-the police on the orders of their leader, held an assembly repeating the made for TV, where everything happened as staged to enhance and give more impact to the citizens by way of an American detective television series.
The skilful Mexican lawyer who defends the French have managed to reverse the process and check that everything was a "show" and that judgment is so flawed and hackneyed that gives rise to many suspicions, insomuch that it is, almost, legally impossible to believe in a proper administration of justice, greatly damaging and immensely pointing to a foreign citizen as absolutely guilty ...
Meanwhile, the victims of kidnappers are opposing the deliberations of the Supreme Court, arguing that if the kidnapper is French, which fully recognize and say that it would be very painful for them, their improper release .
The issue has been politicized enough, thereby averiàndose bilateral relations of both countries. And is not the first time that we Mexicans in serious trouble with the French authorities, even we have historically had to war with them on several occasions: In 1838 when the subjects of France, they said, had multiple grievances against the government of Mexico and its corrupt officials, esenificàndose a war that was called "In The Cake", where the french Pierre Leimoine, required amount of some cakes that were eaten Mexican soldiers in Pastry and who would not pay ... After several months of negotiations and with the landing of a French fleet in the port of Veracruz, war broke out., which Mexico lost since the time the meeting took place was not suitable war for National Unification, political factions that dominated the country did not fulfill their civic duties, against a foreign enemy.
The other war was in the year 1862 by declaring the Juarez government non-payment of foreign debt and the rejection of claims of citizens comjumto Spanish, English and French against Mexico by the events of the War of Reform. All this came to foster a French intervention and the establishment of an empire on the orders of Napoleon III who wanted at all costs monarchy project on Mexican soil.
In 1862 the French were defeated in the glorious battle of May 5 in the city of Puebla, under General Ignacio Zaragoza and his brave army of Indian soldiers Zacapoaxtlas. In 1863 and with an army of 20 000 men and much war material, the shame of defeat was washed and took out a French campaign in Mexico with success, establishing the power to the monarch Maximilian of Austria ...
The current trade-off between France and Mexico will focus to two areas: The Justice and Legality.
It is always fair to punish those guilty of crimes anywhere in the world where these are committed, and according to witnesses and victims French citizen was present at the stage of committing illegal abductions and rapes.
But with respect to the axis of the law, the Mexican police botched its neat research, to conduct a "show" and have no time to detainees to the respective authorities, which marks them as makers of other crimes that clearly invalidate the lawsuit.
Apparently, the law is what gives way to justice and that is disrupted, unfortunately, for the victims of kidnappers. Furthermore, recent research of the case, it has become clear that one of the complainants, has ties to a Jewish merchant who in turn is related to the Secretary of Public Safety who ordered, when it was only police chief, mounting the show television.
For the good of all and with a deep sorrow for what happened to the victims, is needed immediately, the release of Flourance Cassez
French President in one of his visits to Mexico, made no direct mention of the case of his compatriot, with whom he had talked in prison, and in full House of Representatives urged the legislators to see justice done in a clear and transparent to the public gala, stating on the floor of the parliamentary precincts total disagreement and dissatisfaction with the unlawful arrest of the alleged kidnapper ...
It turns out that several of the victims, being detained French citizen, said widely recognize as the executor of several violent threats and want to carry out mutilations on their bodies to force their relatives to deliver the ransom.
The prosecution of the case has already taken more time appointed by law and the alleged kidnapper, and was even sentenced to serve 60 years in prison for the crimes of deprivation of liberty, organized crime, assault and other charges.
His lawyer appealed the sentence and is now a senior judge of the Supreme Court is reviewing the case suggesting that the French citizen and should be released because the trial that was submitted, is riddled with irregularities and it is very difficult to say exactly legal guilt. Even the involvement in the crimes attributed to him ...
The truth of the matter is that the Mexican police if you have made successful and effective investigation, which made them a good time to invest, to the place from where they operated and criminals hiding the band - whose leader, indeed, a lover of French, has been detained for quite a while too, and he was sentenced without the right if any appeal, if it is totally guilty of all crimes-against him, only that investigators incurred a major flaw: Once carried out the arrest - a fact not known at that place-the police on the orders of their leader, held an assembly repeating the made for TV, where everything happened as staged to enhance and give more impact to the citizens by way of an American detective television series.
The skilful Mexican lawyer who defends the French have managed to reverse the process and check that everything was a "show" and that judgment is so flawed and hackneyed that gives rise to many suspicions, insomuch that it is, almost, legally impossible to believe in a proper administration of justice, greatly damaging and immensely pointing to a foreign citizen as absolutely guilty ...
Meanwhile, the victims of kidnappers are opposing the deliberations of the Supreme Court, arguing that if the kidnapper is French, which fully recognize and say that it would be very painful for them, their improper release .
The issue has been politicized enough, thereby averiàndose bilateral relations of both countries. And is not the first time that we Mexicans in serious trouble with the French authorities, even we have historically had to war with them on several occasions: In 1838 when the subjects of France, they said, had multiple grievances against the government of Mexico and its corrupt officials, esenificàndose a war that was called "In The Cake", where the french Pierre Leimoine, required amount of some cakes that were eaten Mexican soldiers in Pastry and who would not pay ... After several months of negotiations and with the landing of a French fleet in the port of Veracruz, war broke out., which Mexico lost since the time the meeting took place was not suitable war for National Unification, political factions that dominated the country did not fulfill their civic duties, against a foreign enemy.
The other war was in the year 1862 by declaring the Juarez government non-payment of foreign debt and the rejection of claims of citizens comjumto Spanish, English and French against Mexico by the events of the War of Reform. All this came to foster a French intervention and the establishment of an empire on the orders of Napoleon III who wanted at all costs monarchy project on Mexican soil.
In 1862 the French were defeated in the glorious battle of May 5 in the city of Puebla, under General Ignacio Zaragoza and his brave army of Indian soldiers Zacapoaxtlas. In 1863 and with an army of 20 000 men and much war material, the shame of defeat was washed and took out a French campaign in Mexico with success, establishing the power to the monarch Maximilian of Austria ...
The current trade-off between France and Mexico will focus to two areas: The Justice and Legality.
It is always fair to punish those guilty of crimes anywhere in the world where these are committed, and according to witnesses and victims French citizen was present at the stage of committing illegal abductions and rapes.
But with respect to the axis of the law, the Mexican police botched its neat research, to conduct a "show" and have no time to detainees to the respective authorities, which marks them as makers of other crimes that clearly invalidate the lawsuit.
Apparently, the law is what gives way to justice and that is disrupted, unfortunately, for the victims of kidnappers. Furthermore, recent research of the case, it has become clear that one of the complainants, has ties to a Jewish merchant who in turn is related to the Secretary of Public Safety who ordered, when it was only police chief, mounting the show television.
For the good of all and with a deep sorrow for what happened to the victims, is needed immediately, the release of Flourance Cassez
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario